Why All Pitchforks Are Not Alike

By Dr. Robert T. Rhode
Published on September 1, 1996
article image

3982 Bollard Avenue Cincinnati, Ohio 45209-1716

Old-time photographs of threshing scenes capture such details as
engines belted to threshing machines, teams pulling wagons, and
crews wearing broad-brimmed hats. Such testimonials to the past
also show a most important but largely overlooked tool the
pitchfork.

Grant Wood’s famous painting American Gothic depicts a
pitchfork in the hand of an unsmiling farmer, but little has been
said to commemorate the implement which lifted the wheat bundles of
yesteryear. In the early days of harvest, pitchforks were made
entirely of wood and had two prongs. Before long, manufacturers
fashioned the tines from iron. The handles continued to be made of
wood, preferably hickory or ash.

A two-tined pitchfork would lift bundles (also called sheaves)
or loose hay, but only an expert could prevent material from
falling through between the tines. Workers with less skill could
use three-tined pitchforks more conveniently. Certain three-pronged
pitchforks were made of wood, but most had iron or steel tines.

The pitcher standing on the ground beside the bundle wagon used
a pitchfork with a long handle. The bundle loader standing on the
wagon used a pitchfork with a short handle. The short handles were
approximately four feet in length. The long handles ran between
four and a half and five and a half feet.

Pitchforks had relatively straight handles. According to Joseph
C. Rhode of Pine Village, Indiana, ‘the advantage in a
straighter handle was that the bundles would slip off the tines
more readily. They would tend to stick on the tines if the handle
had too much curve. I’ve seen a few people with forks where the
handle was perfectly straight, although the tines were curved
slightly.’

Online Store Logo
Need Help? Call 1-866-624-9388