Alternative Transportation Was Necessary for Students

By Clell G. Ballard
Published on May 14, 2013
1 / 4
Proof that a shiny new car is not necessary for pride of ownership.
Proof that a shiny new car is not necessary for pride of ownership.
2 / 4
Important mechanical components were open to the weather. The car had a windshield frame but no glass.
Important mechanical components were open to the weather. The car had a windshield frame but no glass.
3 / 4
A perpetually weak battery really didn’t prove to be much of a problem because the car could be hand-cranked or easily push-started.
A perpetually weak battery really didn’t prove to be much of a problem because the car could be hand-cranked or easily push-started.
4 / 4
Since the vehicle was licensed and had headlights, it was legal to drive on public roads. Note the nearly bald front tires and the completely bald ones on the back.
Since the vehicle was licensed and had headlights, it was legal to drive on public roads. Note the nearly bald front tires and the completely bald ones on the back.

In the 1950s owning an
automobile was not possible for every family, let alone every young person who
would love to have “wheels.” If you ask people who are of retirement age today,
they will tell you that only a very small number of high school students drove
to school back then. Large parking lots were not needed at schools as they are
now.

Online Store Logo
Need Help? Call 1-866-624-9388