Did You Know That?

By Leroy W. Blaker
Published on November 1, 1972
article image
Wm. Strayer
1884 Frick Traction Engine, very early notice link motion. Courtesy of Wm. Strayer, R. D. 1, Dillsburg, Pa. 17019.

Alvordton, Ohio 43501

Many of the steam traction engine manufacturers built some
compound engines. A compound engine uses the steam twice before it
is exhausted up the smokestack to increase the draft. The low
pressure cylinder generally has about double the piston area of the
high pressure cylinder, and gets its steam after it leaves the high
pressure cylinder, or no steam direct from the boiler.

The tandem compound has both piston heads on the same piston
rod. In the cross-compound, the high and low pressure cylinders are
set side by side with two cranks set 90 degrees apart. The Woolf
compound was a tandem, and used by many early manufacturers who
knew their economy, but later discontinued building them due to
paying royalty on the patent, and extra cost of building.

The Woolf patent expired about 1915, and the Port Huron Engine
& Thresher Co. used their own name on the cylinder name plate.
Although they built a very good simple piston valve steam traction
engine, they realized the greater economy of their compounds. They
built only tandem compounds the last eight years building
engines.

Economy runs made at several thresher reunions about 10 years
ago, show a 40 year old 24-75 Hp. Port Huron ‘Longfellow’
developed a Hp. hour on 20.2 Lbs. of water, and evaporated 8.75
Lbs. of water per pound of coal with a 57.65 Hp. load on the Baker
Prony brake.

This economy run compares favorably with a Corliss stationary
steam engine. Compared with over a dozen other steam traction
engines including Baker Uniflows in these tests, all other engines
used an average of over 50 percent more water, and over 100 percent
more coal per horsepower hour.

Online Store Logo
Need Help? Call 1-866-624-9388