SOOT IN THE FLUES

By Anna Mae
Published on November 1, 1983
article image

Hi! to all our dear family out there! Boy, is it hot!! And I
guess I’m not supposed to say it but this is the last issue of
the year, the Nov-Dec. one, the cold and snowy time of year right
now, it sounds deliciously cool. Well. We are never satisfied, are
we? Comes winter, we’ll be wishing for spring and summer, but
it is fun though to have four seasons of course that’s what
we’re used to back here in Pennsylvania – I don’t know if
I’d like living where the weather is always the same. Well,
anyhow it is that time to think of house cleaning (that’s
changed a good bit these latter years too) fall activities,
Christmas surprises, festive dinners, helping others, not thinking
of No. 1 so often and those New Year resolutions good luck -how did
the last year’s ones hold up? Anyhow, good times ahead for you
in 1984, may you have many blessings in store!

MEL GRENVIK, Kenmare, North Dakota 58746 sends a letter
regarding the inquiry by George W. Mairs of Pinckney, Michigan in
the July-August issue concerning license agreements between
American and Canadian firms for building American designs in
Canada. ‘I know of only two in addition to the Baker-MacDonald
deal he mentions, ‘ relates Mel.

The Robert Bell Engine and Thresher Company of Seaforth, Ontario
completed a license agreement in about 1900 to build the Port Huron
steam traction engine in Canada. This was a design by the Port
Huron Engine and Thresher Co. of Port Huron, Michigan. I believe
the Bell Company is still in business and offers to manufacture a
complete new boiler for steam traction engines.

Also, the John Abell factory in Toronto was purchased by the
combination of Advance Thresher Co. and Minneapolis Threshing
Machine Co. in 1902 and reorganized as the American Abell Engine
and Thresher Company. This factory was absorbed by M. Rumely
Company in 1912.

Possibly older readers know of other such agreements across the
border. I hope this information is of some help.’ (Any other
folks have any data on this issue, please let us hear from
you.)

‘I’m writing in regard to a letter on page 13 of the
July-August I.M.A. from R. W. Creek. I enjoyed his letter but I
feel the R.P.M. figures for the drive pulley and mandrel pulley are
turned around. I believe it should read a 14 inch drive pulley
turning 900 RPM. Driving a 28’ mandrel pulley will produce a
saw speed of approximately 450 RPM. Using the sizes of pulleys
listed and the RPM figures given, this is the only combination that
would produce a reasonable saw speed, as I don’t believe you
would want to turn the saw at 900.

Online Store Logo
Need Help? Call 1-866-624-9388